fix enum.property reference in docs #25875
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for merging! This will need to be backported to the 3.10 branch. |
|
Thanks @JelleZijlstra for the PR, and @ethanfurman for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10. |
|
GH-25876 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch. |
|
And I just acquired the power to tell @miss-islington to do that :) |
orsenthil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2021
(cherry picked from commit 6fee083) Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In https://docs.python.org/3.10/library/enum.html#module-contents, the link for the new
enum.propertycurrently links to the docs forbuiltins.propertyinstead. Adding a leading dot makes it a local reference.Requesting review from @ethanfurman