Skip to content

[3.10] bpo-44184: Apply GH-26274 to the non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc (GH-27165) #27174

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Jul 15, 2021

The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as GH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.)

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184
(cherry picked from commit 074e765)

Co-authored-by: T. Wouters [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184

…dealloc (pythonGH-27165)

The non-GC-type branch of subtype_dealloc is using the type of an object after freeing in the same unsafe way as pythonGH-26274 fixes. (I believe the old news entry covers this change well enough.)

https://bugs.python.org/issue44184
(cherry picked from commit 074e765)

Co-authored-by: T. Wouters <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Yhg1s: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@Yhg1s
Copy link
Member

Yhg1s commented Jul 15, 2021

The failed Windows x86 test is test_unicodedata, and it failed because of network issues, nothing to do with the backport.

@Yhg1s Yhg1s merged commit 6aa59c6 into python:3.10 Jul 15, 2021
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-074e765-3.10 branch July 15, 2021 23:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants