Skip to content

bpo-25735: math.factorial doc should mention integer return type #6420

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 31, 2019

Conversation

akshaysharma096
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaysharma096 akshaysharma096 commented Apr 8, 2018

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

@akshaysharma096
Copy link
Contributor Author

akshaysharma096 commented Apr 9, 2018

@chadmiller-amzn
Copy link

chadmiller-amzn commented Apr 9, 2018

The bot isn't that smart yet. File a bug report in the bot's source's github page, asking for a manual re-run.

@chadmiller-amzn
Copy link

Is this necessary? I don't think anyone could realistically think it's not an integer.

@akshaysharma096
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chadmiller-amzn Yes, it is, but always better to specify to save developer time.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Added documentations for :func:`fabs`, to take only integer input values.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this say "added documentation for func factorial to indicate that returns integer values" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noted will do

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mcscope you can check again

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Added documentation for func factorial to indicate that returns integer values
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need a NEWS entry for adding 3 words to the doc? I don't think so.

Copy link
Contributor

@csabella csabella left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaysharma096: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaysharma096: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@csabella csabella added the docs Documentation in the Doc dir label May 31, 2019
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaysharma096: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@csabella csabella merged commit 4612671 into python:master May 31, 2019
@csabella
Copy link
Contributor

@akshaysharma096, thank you for the contribution. It has now been merged! 🎉

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @akshaysharma096 for the PR, and @csabella for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.7.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request May 31, 2019
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-13702 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.7 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants