[3.7] bpo-33329: Fix multiprocessing regression on newer glibcs (GH-6575) #6579
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
) Starting with glibc 2.27.9000-xxx, sigaddset() can return EINVAL for some reserved signal numbers between 1 and NSIG. The `range(1, NSIG)` idiom is commonly used to select all signals for blocking with `pthread_sigmask`. So we ignore the sigaddset() return value until we expose sigfillset() to provide a better idiom. (cherry picked from commit 25038ec) Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
bedevere-bot
added
type-bug
|
@pitrou: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
|
Thanks, @pitrou! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Starting with glibc 2.27.9000-xxx, sigaddset() can return EINVAL for some
reserved signal numbers between 1 and NSIG. The
range(1, NSIG)idiomis commonly used to select all signals for blocking with
pthread_sigmask.So we ignore the sigaddset() return value until we expose sigfillset()
to provide a better idiom.
(cherry picked from commit 25038ec)
Co-authored-by: Antoine Pitrou [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue33329