[3.6] bpo-29710: Clarify documentation for Bitwise binary operation (GH-1691) #8509
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…GH-1691) Mathematically, bitwise operations on integers behave as if there were an infinite number of sign bits. Pragmatically, that gives the same answer as using one extra sign bit for the bitwise logical operations. (cherry picked from commit b4bc5ca) Co-authored-by: Sanyam Khurana <[email protected]>
|
@CuriousLearner and @ncoghlan: Backport status check is done, and it's a success ✅ . |
ncoghlan
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mathematically, bitwise operations on integers behave as if there were an
infinite number of sign bits. Pragmatically, that gives the same answer as
using one extra sign bit for the bitwise logical operations.
(cherry picked from commit b4bc5ca)
Co-authored-by: Sanyam Khurana [email protected]
https://bugs.python.org/issue29710