Skip to content

[3.11] Adjust stable ABI internal documentation (GH-96896) #97828

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

I was perusing this file, and noticed that this part of the documentation is slightly out of date: the struct items in this TOML file currently contain struct_abi_kind members, which distinguish between the different types of ABI compatibility described in the comment.

I've updated the comment to reflect this.
(cherry picked from commit 6e53308)

Co-authored-by: William Woodruff [email protected]

I was perusing this file, and noticed that this part of the documentation is slightly out of date: the `struct` items in this TOML file currently contain `struct_abi_kind` members, which distinguish between the different types of ABI compatibility described in the comment.

I've updated the comment to reflect this.
(cherry picked from commit 6e53308)

Co-authored-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 6 of 9 required status checks are expected..

1 similar comment
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 6 of 9 required status checks are expected..

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅.

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit bbecca5 into python:3.11 Oct 4, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-6e53308-3.11 branch October 4, 2022 13:15
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants