-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
Support nested namedtuple classes. #15064
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
hmc-cs-mdrissi
wants to merge
2
commits into
python:master
Choose a base branch
from
hmc-cs-mdrissi:md/nested_namedtuple_classes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+28
−0
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on exploring debugger I feel like this line is wrong. Main issue is for this case,
B must be analyzed before field x's type is examined. If I drop this line then reveal_type(A.B) gives desired result and class gets analyzed I think here, but it introduces an error of
Name "Bar" is not defined [name-defined]
from this line. I could maybe add scope here, but sorta feels right path is to analyze nested class defs before processing fields. Seems like I should defer for this and unsure on right way to do it.edit: The main difference with nested non-namedtuple class is we analyze x's type during analyze_class_body_common after B's class def has been analyzed. For namedtuple case analyze_class_body_common happens but after all attributes have been analyzed first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure what's the issue here, but you may need to set up a bunch of state/context in the semantic analyzer to allow nested classes to be processed correctly. For named tuples we probably don't set up all the context right now, since it's not needed to process attributes.
One idea would be to process named tuple class bodies normally (similar to regular classes) in the semantic analyzer even for named tuples, but we'd skip attribute definitions during this pass. The current namedtuple pass would then ignore everything else except attribute definitions. This would be a more complex change, however.