Check for missing arrays in Program #1519
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/1519
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 188156d with merge base a81c2d4 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
CLA Signed
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52493423 |
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
Summary: Don't fail fatally if the .pte file contains an unknown type enum value. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493415
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
force-pushed
the
export-D52493423
branch
from
eb40380 to
188156d
Compare
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
|
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52493423 |
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
dbort
added a commit
to dbort/executorch
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2024
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for `nullptr` before calling `size()` on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing. Differential Revision: D52493423
|
This pull request has been merged in d869385. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary: Flatbuffer array fields can be missing, so we need to check for
nullptrbefore callingsize()on them. Discovered by lionhead fuzzing.Differential Revision: D52493423