-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 606
Fix some printf warnings in executor_runner.cpp #1529
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/1529
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (3 Unrelated Failures)As of commit 50bc720 with merge base f37bb47 ( FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52528480 |
dd156fa
to
7670f40
Compare
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
Summary: Ensure that the `args` arrays of `KernelCall` and `DelegateCall` instruction entries are present before using them. Reviewed By: larryliu0820 Differential Revision: D52451746
Summary: Don't use the backend ID field unless it's present. Reviewed By: lucylq Differential Revision: D52451737
…torch#1507) Summary: Some MethodMeta methods don't return Error, assuming that the underlying data is valid. Ensure that the underlying ExecutionPlan is valid for those fields before returning a MethodMeta. For fields whose accessors do return Error or Result, we can check them at the time they're called and return non-fatally then. Reviewed By: lucylq Differential Revision: D52451736
Summary: I forgot to remove this from D52451739. Differential Revision: D52528209
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52528480 |
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
7670f40
to
50bc720
Compare
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D52528480 |
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Differential Revision: D52528480
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first. Reviewed By: larryliu0820 Differential Revision: D52528480
This pull request has been merged in e089910. |
Summary: Some compilers don't like passing enums as printf arguments without casting them first.
Differential Revision: D52528480