Skip to content

[ET-VK][ez] Fix undefined behaviour in ambiguous ParamsBuffer constructor #7478

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

SS-JIA
Copy link
Contributor

@SS-JIA SS-JIA commented Jan 2, 2025

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Context

I discovered this bug when trying to execute the vulkan_compute_api_test binary on Windows. Almost all the tests were failing, with compute shaders producing incorrect results. After bisecting the change, it turns out the culprit is #7015. The diff introduced an alternative templated constructor for ParamsBuffer which would initialize an empty UBO with a specified size instead of wrapping a pre-existing object.

The issue is that these constructors are ambiguous because they both are template constructors and both only accept one argument. Therefore, the original constructor would be called when certain callsites intended to call the new constructor. This results in a UBO being created with an incorrect size, and resulted in the tensor's metadata being passed incorrectly into a compute shader.

To fix, I added a dummy argument into the new constructor for disambiguation purposes. I also changed it so that it's not templated, since there's no reason for it to be templated.

Differential Revision: D67770791

…ructor

## Context

I discovered this bug when trying to execute the `vulkan_compute_api_test` binary on Windows. Almost all the tests were failing, with compute shaders producing incorrect results. After bisecting the change, it turns out the culprit is #7015. The diff introduced an alternative templated constructor for `ParamsBuffer` which would initialize an empty UBO with a specified size instead of wrapping a pre-existing object.

The issue is that these constructors are ambiguous because they both are template constructors and both only accept one argument. Therefore, the original constructor would be called when certain callsites intended to call the new constructor. This results in a UBO being created with an incorrect size, and resulted in the tensor's metadata being passed incorrectly into a compute shader.

To fix, I added a dummy argument into the new constructor for disambiguation purposes. I also changed it so that it's not templated, since there's no reason for it to be templated.

Differential Revision: [D67770791](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770791/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 2, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/7478

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 1 New Failure

As of commit bc0facd with merge base d3e58b0 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jan 2, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D67770791

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit 2d8a520 into gh/SS-JIA/159/base Jan 3, 2025
44 of 49 checks passed
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/SS-JIA/159/head branch January 3, 2025 00:06
SS-JIA added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…ructor (#7482)

## Context

I discovered this bug when trying to execute the `vulkan_compute_api_test` binary on Windows. Almost all the tests were failing, with compute shaders producing incorrect results. After bisecting the change, it turns out the culprit is #7015. The diff introduced an alternative templated constructor for `ParamsBuffer` which would initialize an empty UBO with a specified size instead of wrapping a pre-existing object.

The issue is that these constructors are ambiguous because they both are template constructors and both only accept one argument. Therefore, the original constructor would be called when certain callsites intended to call the new constructor. This results in a UBO being created with an incorrect size, and resulted in the tensor's metadata being passed incorrectly into a compute shader.

To fix, I added a dummy argument into the new constructor for disambiguation purposes. I also changed it so that it's not templated, since there's no reason for it to be templated.

Differential Revision: [D67770791](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770791/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031108
Pull Request resolved: #7478

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
SS-JIA added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…ed (#7483)

* [ET-VK][ez] Fix undefined behaviour in ambiguous `ParamsBuffer` constructor

## Context

I discovered this bug when trying to execute the `vulkan_compute_api_test` binary on Windows. Almost all the tests were failing, with compute shaders producing incorrect results. After bisecting the change, it turns out the culprit is #7015. The diff introduced an alternative templated constructor for `ParamsBuffer` which would initialize an empty UBO with a specified size instead of wrapping a pre-existing object.

The issue is that these constructors are ambiguous because they both are template constructors and both only accept one argument. Therefore, the original constructor would be called when certain callsites intended to call the new constructor. This results in a UBO being created with an incorrect size, and resulted in the tensor's metadata being passed incorrectly into a compute shader.

To fix, I added a dummy argument into the new constructor for disambiguation purposes. I also changed it so that it's not templated, since there's no reason for it to be templated.

Differential Revision: [D67770791](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770791/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031108
Pull Request resolved: #7478

* [ET-VK] Create Pipeline layouts with push constant ranges when required

## Context

#7223 added the ability to use push constants in shaders. However, one thing the diff missed was not specifying that the compute pipeline layout needed to include a push constant upon creation. The Vulkan validation layers warns against this, and on certain GPUs such as the integrated Intel GPU on my windows laptop compute shaders will produce incorrect output.

This diff makes the change such that the compute pipeline layout will be created with a push constant block if necessary.

## Solution

Change the key of the pipeline layout cache to accept an additional push constant size field. The push constant size will be used to create the pipeline layout with a push constant block of the specified size.

Differential Revision: [D67770793](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770793/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031109
Pull Request resolved: #7479

---------

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
SS-JIA added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
* [ET-VK][ez] Fix undefined behaviour in ambiguous `ParamsBuffer` constructor

## Context

I discovered this bug when trying to execute the `vulkan_compute_api_test` binary on Windows. Almost all the tests were failing, with compute shaders producing incorrect results. After bisecting the change, it turns out the culprit is #7015. The diff introduced an alternative templated constructor for `ParamsBuffer` which would initialize an empty UBO with a specified size instead of wrapping a pre-existing object.

The issue is that these constructors are ambiguous because they both are template constructors and both only accept one argument. Therefore, the original constructor would be called when certain callsites intended to call the new constructor. This results in a UBO being created with an incorrect size, and resulted in the tensor's metadata being passed incorrectly into a compute shader.

To fix, I added a dummy argument into the new constructor for disambiguation purposes. I also changed it so that it's not templated, since there's no reason for it to be templated.

Differential Revision: [D67770791](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770791/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031108
Pull Request resolved: #7478

* [ET-VK] Create Pipeline layouts with push constant ranges when required

## Context

#7223 added the ability to use push constants in shaders. However, one thing the diff missed was not specifying that the compute pipeline layout needed to include a push constant upon creation. The Vulkan validation layers warns against this, and on certain GPUs such as the integrated Intel GPU on my windows laptop compute shaders will produce incorrect output.

This diff makes the change such that the compute pipeline layout will be created with a push constant block if necessary.

## Solution

Change the key of the pipeline layout cache to accept an additional push constant size field. The push constant size will be used to create the pipeline layout with a push constant block of the specified size.

Differential Revision: [D67770793](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770793/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031109
Pull Request resolved: #7479

* [ET-VK] Fix metadata UBO VVL warnings

## Context

Recently #7015 was implemented so that all tensor metadata (e.g. sizes, strides) would be stored in a single UBO instead of with separate UBO objects. This helps with memory savings presumably due to defragmentation of memory allocations.

However, once the change was introduced, I noticed two new warnings produced by the Vulkan Validation Layer.

The first complains that the offset of a UBO descriptor is not a multiple of the `minUniformBufferOffsetAlignment` field reported by the physical device properties.

The second complains that the range of a UBO descriptor exceeds the offset + range of the underlying UBO object.

# Solution

To address the first one, instead of using `sizeof(utils::ivec4)` to determine the offset per metadata field, check the `minUniformBufferOffsetAlignment` field of reported by the device and use that instead.

The second warning arises because the logic in the constructor of `BufferBindInfo` had a mistake; instead of using the range of the underlying UBO object, it should use the range subtracted by the user specified offset.

Differential Revision: [D67770792](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D67770792/)

ghstack-source-id: 260031110
Pull Request resolved: #7480

---------

Co-authored-by: Stephen Jia <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants