Skip to content

Add CodeQL code security analysis workflow #1085

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2021
Merged

Conversation

MirahImage
Copy link
Member

Proposed Changes

Adds CodeQL code security analysis github actions workflow

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes issue #NNNN)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause an observable behavior change in existing systems)
  • Documentation improvements (corrections, new content, etc)
  • Cosmetic change (whitespace, formatting, etc)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • I have signed the CA (see https://cla.pivotal.io/sign/rabbitmq)
  • All tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in related repositories

@YulerB
Copy link
Contributor

YulerB commented Sep 17, 2021

If adding Code QL, might also be worthwhile adding the CodeQL badge to readme.md.

@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit 7640036 into main Oct 17, 2021
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the add-codeql-workflow branch October 17, 2021 07:41
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2021
Add CodeQL code security analysis workflow

(cherry picked from commit 7640036)

Conflicts:
	README.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants