Skip to content

Schedule instead of GetAwaiter().GetResult() #773

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2020

Conversation

danielmarbach
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed Changes

Any reasons why we can't directly use Schedule instead of GetAwaiter().GetResul()?

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Should be green once rebased on top of #772

@lukebakken lukebakken self-assigned this Mar 25, 2020
@lukebakken lukebakken added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Mar 25, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@lukebakken lukebakken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 thanks. Just waiting on the fresh round of CI runs.

@danielmarbach
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can you verify if my assumptions where correct? Based on my research the work pool should still be available and therefore we can schedule still but I would like to have this confirmed

@lukebakken lukebakken merged commit c0178a2 into rabbitmq:master Mar 25, 2020
lukebakken added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2020
Schedule instead of GetAwaiter().GetResult()

(cherry picked from commit c0178a2)
@lukebakken
Copy link
Collaborator

Backported to 5.x

@danielmarbach danielmarbach deleted the model-shutdown branch August 16, 2020 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants