Skip to content

4.0.6: backport #12921 by @noxdafox, take 2 #12944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024

Conversation

michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

`is_duplicate` callback signature was changed in order to support both
the mirroring queues as well as the de-duplication ones.

As the mirroring queues are now deprecated and removed, we can fall
back to a simpler boolean as return value.

Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c927446)
(cherry picked from commit 6a6e760)
As the de-duplication plugin is the only adopter of the `is_duplicate`
callback, we now use a simpler signature.

When a message is deemed duplicated, we discard it and re-route it to
dead letter exchange.

Signed-off-by: Matteo Cafasso <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f93baa3)
(cherry picked from commit 8d7535e)
@michaelklishin michaelklishin modified the milestone: 4.0.5 Dec 14, 2024
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 4.0.6 milestone Dec 15, 2024
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is potentially risky change so it will have to wait until 4.0.6.

@michaelklishin michaelklishin changed the title v4.0.x: backport #12921 by @noxdafox, take 2 DO NOT MERGE For 4.0.6: backport #12921 by @noxdafox, take 2 Dec 15, 2024
@michaelklishin michaelklishin changed the title DO NOT MERGE For 4.0.6: backport #12921 by @noxdafox, take 2 4.0.6: backport #12921 by @noxdafox, take 2 Dec 19, 2024
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit 3548fd5 into v4.0.x Dec 19, 2024
10 checks passed
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the mk-backport-rabbitmq-server-12921-take-2 branch December 19, 2024 23:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants