4.x: Optimise msg_store recovery in case of large message file (backport #13250) (backport #13373) #13375
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed Changes
Since 4.0.0 (commit d45fbc3) the shared message store writes large messages into their own rdq files. This information can be utilised when scanning rdq files during recovery to avoid reading in the whole message body into memory unnecessarily.
This commit addresses the same issue that was addressed in 3.13.x by commit baeefbe (ie. appending a large binary together from 4MB chunks leaves a lot of garbage and memory fragmentation behind) but even more efficiently.
Large messages which were written before 4.0.0, which don't fully fill the rdq file, are still handled as before.
Types of Changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an
x
in the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
x
in the boxes that apply.You can also fill these out after creating the PR.
If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the mailing list.
We're here to help!
This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.
CONTRIBUTING.md
documentFurther Comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution
you did and what alternatives you considered, etc.
This is an automatic backport of pull request #13250 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).
This is an automatic backport of pull request #13373 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).