Skip to content

[HOTFIX] Fixes issue with setup.cfg where a comma is missing #73

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 7, 2024

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link
Owner

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 7, 2024

This is a minor Hotfix to correct a typo in setup.cfg that broke CI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version specification syntax in the configuration file for improved clarity and correctness.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall added this to the Version 1.1.5 milestone Sep 7, 2024
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall self-assigned this Sep 7, 2024
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 96a3e22..1e58bcd. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Walkthrough

A minor modification was made to the setup.cfg file, specifically correcting the syntax in the python_requires directive by adding a comma. This change ensures proper parsing of version requirements without altering the logic or functionality of the package.

Changes

File Change Summary
setup.cfg Corrected syntax in python_requires by adding a comma between version specifications.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, where the bunnies play,
A comma was added, hip-hip-hooray!
With versions aligned, our paths now are clear,
Hop along, dear friends, there's nothing to fear!
Let's dance through the fields of syntax delight,
For every small change makes our code feel just right! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Configs Improvements or additions to configuration label Sep 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.000%. Comparing base (96a3e22) to head (1e58bcd).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             master        #73   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage   100.000%   100.000%           
===========================================
  Files             1          1           
  Lines            33         33           
===========================================
  Hits             33         33           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 96.970% <ø> (ø)
3.11 100.000% <ø> (ø)
3.12 100.000% <ø> (ø)
3.7 96.429% <ø> (ø)
3.8 96.429% <ø> (ø)
3.9 96.429% <ø> (ø)
macos-13 96.970% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest 100.000% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-latest 100.000% <ø> (ø)
windows-latest 96.970% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96a3e22...1e58bcd. Read the comment docs.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 96a3e22 and 1e58bcd.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • setup.cfg (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • setup.cfg

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall merged commit d288e89 into master Sep 7, 2024
103 of 163 checks passed
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall deleted the HOTFIX-115-A branch September 7, 2024 04:56
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Configs Improvements or additions to configuration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant