Skip to content

KeyT for set operations #3190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 11, 2025
Merged

KeyT for set operations #3190

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 11, 2025

Conversation

earonesty
Copy link
Contributor

@earonesty earonesty commented Mar 20, 2024

Description of change

Change set operation key-types to KeyT

#3189

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.74%. Comparing base (2f88840) to head (f182655).
Report is 20 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3190      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.84%   91.74%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         128      128              
  Lines       33232    33328      +96     
==========================================
+ Hits        30523    30577      +54     
- Misses       2709     2751      +42     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gerzse
Copy link
Contributor

gerzse commented May 15, 2024

@earonesty, somehow this PR ended up in conflict state. Could you, please, update it, so we merge it? Thanks!

@petyaslavova petyaslavova added the maintenance Maintenance (CI, Releases, etc) label May 30, 2025
@petyaslavova petyaslavova merged commit 9a53d46 into redis:master Jun 11, 2025
63 of 64 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
maintenance Maintenance (CI, Releases, etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants