Skip to content

[feature] improve ppx to handle arbitrary arity - #389

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2016
Merged

[feature] improve ppx to handle arbitrary arity - #389

merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2016

Conversation

bobzhang
Copy link
Member

  • design: should we fall back to built-in when the arity is low?

[feature] improve ppx to handle arbitrary arity -- design: should we …
60c1e27 
…fall back to built-in when the arity is low?
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 50.616% when pulling 60c1e27 on handle_arbitray_arity into da736d4 on master.

@bobzhang bobzhang merged commit 9aa565f into master May 20, 2016
@bobzhang bobzhang deleted the handle_arbitray_arity branch May 20, 2016 15:16
kevinbarabash pushed a commit to kevinbarabash/rescript-compiler that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2021
@a-c-sreedhar-reddy
Explicit type annotation for unit (rescript-lang#389)
6155500 
* check if unit is typed

* check for Lindent _ instead of just unit

* check for type instead of just lident

* remove debug code

* added tests for ()

* added commits

* removed test.res ( which got added by mistake)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bobzhang @coveralls