Microbenchmarks for tcp and local #184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
#### Problem No benchmarks for transports. #### Modification Added a benchmark to compare request-response across multiple transports. Added local and tcp for now. #### Result Benchmark to give some idea about how different changes impact the perf.
|
👍 |
ilayaperumalg
pushed a commit
to ilayaperumalg/rsocket-java
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 26, 2017
* Change application reserved error code range We now have codes up to 204, so application needs to start at 205. * Update Protocol.md * Update Protocol.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
No benchmarks for transports.
Modification
Added a benchmark to compare request-response across multiple transports. Added local and tcp for now.
Result
Benchmark to give some idea about how different changes impact the perf.