Skip to content

Follow updated ruby versions in the matrix #1906

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2017
Merged

Follow updated ruby versions in the matrix #1906

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 9, 2017

Conversation

kachick
Copy link
Contributor

@kachick kachick commented Nov 3, 2017

I don't have confident as these configuration, was it not tracked in the rspec-dev script? 🤔

.travis.yml Outdated
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ rvm:
- 1.8.7
- 2.4.2
- 2.3.5
- 2.2
- 2.2.7
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2.2 automatically tracks the latest, but yes I forgot to update the matrix when I did everything else, can you back out the 2.2 changes and then this can be merged?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Just reverted around 2.2 changes as c6a47a0

@JonRowe JonRowe merged commit 06ce0da into rspec:master Nov 9, 2017
@JonRowe
Copy link
Member

JonRowe commented Nov 9, 2017

Merged despite build failure as unrelated.

@kachick
Copy link
Contributor Author

kachick commented Nov 9, 2017

Thank you!

@kachick kachick deleted the follow-generator-updated-travis branch November 9, 2017 03:40
JonRowe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2017
* Follow updated ruby versions in the matrix

* Keep 2.2.n matrix as before
sebjacobs pushed a commit to futurelearn/rspec-rails that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2019
* Follow updated ruby versions in the matrix

* Keep 2.2.n matrix as before
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants