Add tests for taproot descriptors having deep scripts trees. #407
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
kanishk779
commented
May 12, 2022
kanishk779
commented
- As we know that there is a limit to the depth of the script tree in taproot specification.
- These tests try to create script trees with depths 127 and 128. The limit is 128 (i.e a script tree of depth 129 is invalid) for valid trees.
- Another test with a complete tree having 128 leaves has also been added.
- A simple python script was used to generate these test cases, here it is.
sanket1729
reviewed
May 12, 2022
| psbt.unsigned_tx.output.push(TxOut { | ||
| value: 99_999_000, | ||
| value: 99_997_000, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Interesting, thanks for debugging. Will open this up with a good first issue.
integration_test/src/main.rs
Outdated
|
|
||
| // Test 8: Test script tree of depth 128 is valid, only X129 is known | ||
| test_desc::test_desc_satisfy(cl, testdata, "tr(X!,{pk(X1!),{pk(X2!),{pk(X3!),{pk(X4!),{pk(X5!),{pk(X6!),{pk(X7!),{pk(X8!),{pk(X9!),{pk(X10!),{pk(X11!),{pk(X12!),{pk(X13!),{pk(X14!),{pk(X15!),{pk(X16!),{pk(X17!),{pk(X18!),{pk(X19!),{pk(X20!),{pk(X21!),{pk(X22!),{pk(X23!),{pk(X24!),{pk(X25!),{pk(X26!),{pk(X27!),{pk(X28!),{pk(X29!),{pk(X30!),{pk(X31!),{pk(X32!),{pk(X33!),{pk(X34!),{pk(X35!),{pk(X36!),{pk(X37!),{pk(X38!),{pk(X39!),{pk(X40!),{pk(X41!),{pk(X42!),{pk(X43!),{pk(X44!),{pk(X45!),{pk(X46!),{pk(X47!),{pk(X48!),{pk(X49!),{pk(X50!),{pk(X51!),{pk(X52!),{pk(X53!),{pk(X54!),{pk(X55!),{pk(X56!),{pk(X57!),{pk(X58!),{pk(X59!),{pk(X60!),{pk(X61!),{pk(X62!),{pk(X63!),{pk(X64!),{pk(X65!),{pk(X66!),{pk(X67!),{pk(X68!),{pk(X69!),{pk(X70!),{pk(X71!),{pk(X72!),{pk(X73!),{pk(X74!),{pk(X75!),{pk(X76!),{pk(X77!),{pk(X78!),{pk(X79!),{pk(X80!),{pk(X81!),{pk(X82!),{pk(X83!),{pk(X84!),{pk(X85!),{pk(X86!),{pk(X87!),{pk(X88!),{pk(X89!),{pk(X90!),{pk(X91!),{pk(X92!),{pk(X93!),{pk(X94!),{pk(X95!),{pk(X96!),{pk(X97!),{pk(X98!),{pk(X99!),{pk(X100!),{pk(X101!),{pk(X102!),{pk(X103!),{pk(X104!),{pk(X105!),{pk(X106!),{pk(X107!),{pk(X108!),{pk(X109!),{pk(X110!),{pk(X111!),{pk(X112!),{pk(X113!),{pk(X114!),{pk(X115!),{pk(X116!),{pk(X117!),{pk(X118!),{pk(X119!),{pk(X120!),{pk(X121!),{pk(X122!),{pk(X123!),{pk(X124!),{pk(X125!),{pk(X126!),{pk(X127!),{pk(X128!),pk(X129)}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})"); | ||
| //test_desc::test_desc_satisfy(cl, testdata, "tr(X!,{pk(X1!),{pk(X2!),{pk(X3!),{pk(X4!),{pk(X5!),{pk(X6!),{pk(X7!),{pk(X8!),{pk(X9!),{pk(X10!),{pk(X11!),{pk(X12!),{pk(X13!),{pk(X14!),{pk(X15!),{pk(X16!),{pk(X17!),{pk(X18!),{pk(X19!),{pk(X20!),{pk(X21!),{pk(X22!),{pk(X23!),{pk(X24!),{pk(X25!),{pk(X26!),{pk(X27!),{pk(X28!),{pk(X29!),{pk(X30!),{pk(X31!),{pk(X32!),{pk(X33!),{pk(X34!),{pk(X35!),{pk(X36!),{pk(X37!),{pk(X38!),{pk(X39!),{pk(X40!),{pk(X41!),{pk(X42!),{pk(X43!),{pk(X44!),{pk(X45!),{pk(X46!),{pk(X47!),{pk(X48!),{pk(X49!),{pk(X50!),{pk(X51!),{pk(X52!),{pk(X53!),{pk(X54!),{pk(X55!),{pk(X56!),{pk(X57!),{pk(X58!),{pk(X59!),{pk(X60!),{pk(X61!),{pk(X62!),{pk(X63!),{pk(X64!),{pk(X65!),{pk(X66!),{pk(X67!),{pk(X68!),{pk(X69!),{pk(X70!),{pk(X71!),{pk(X72!),{pk(X73!),{pk(X74!),{pk(X75!),{pk(X76!),{pk(X77!),{pk(X78!),{pk(X79!),{pk(X80!),{pk(X81!),{pk(X82!),{pk(X83!),{pk(X84!),{pk(X85!),{pk(X86!),{pk(X87!),{pk(X88!),{pk(X89!),{pk(X90!),{pk(X91!),{pk(X92!),{pk(X93!),{pk(X94!),{pk(X95!),{pk(X96!),{pk(X97!),{pk(X98!),{pk(X99!),{pk(X100!),{pk(X101!),{pk(X102!),{pk(X103!),{pk(X104!),{pk(X105!),{pk(X106!),{pk(X107!),{pk(X108!),{pk(X109!),{pk(X110!),{pk(X111!),{pk(X112!),{pk(X113!),{pk(X114!),{pk(X115!),{pk(X116!),{pk(X117!),{pk(X118!),{pk(X119!),{pk(X120!),{pk(X121!),{pk(X122!),{pk(X123!),{pk(X124!),{pk(X125!),{pk(X126!),{pk(X127!),{pk(X128!),{pk(X129!),pk(X130)}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did you also add a commented test here? This does not belong in this commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I should have removed it. This was for testing with depth 129 trees to check whether they are invalid or not.
|
Can you make sure there is only commit here? @kanishk779. It might require you to read online about |
…128 and a complete tree
kanishk779
force-pushed
the
extreme-tr-tests
branch
from
0ca46ba to
1ff13d4
Compare
sanket1729
approved these changes
May 19, 2022
|
|
||
| // Test 8: Test script tree of depth 128 is valid, only X129 is known | ||
| test_desc::test_desc_satisfy(cl, testdata, "tr(X!,{pk(X1!),{pk(X2!),{pk(X3!),{pk(X4!),{pk(X5!),{pk(X6!),{pk(X7!),{pk(X8!),{pk(X9!),{pk(X10!),{pk(X11!),{pk(X12!),{pk(X13!),{pk(X14!),{pk(X15!),{pk(X16!),{pk(X17!),{pk(X18!),{pk(X19!),{pk(X20!),{pk(X21!),{pk(X22!),{pk(X23!),{pk(X24!),{pk(X25!),{pk(X26!),{pk(X27!),{pk(X28!),{pk(X29!),{pk(X30!),{pk(X31!),{pk(X32!),{pk(X33!),{pk(X34!),{pk(X35!),{pk(X36!),{pk(X37!),{pk(X38!),{pk(X39!),{pk(X40!),{pk(X41!),{pk(X42!),{pk(X43!),{pk(X44!),{pk(X45!),{pk(X46!),{pk(X47!),{pk(X48!),{pk(X49!),{pk(X50!),{pk(X51!),{pk(X52!),{pk(X53!),{pk(X54!),{pk(X55!),{pk(X56!),{pk(X57!),{pk(X58!),{pk(X59!),{pk(X60!),{pk(X61!),{pk(X62!),{pk(X63!),{pk(X64!),{pk(X65!),{pk(X66!),{pk(X67!),{pk(X68!),{pk(X69!),{pk(X70!),{pk(X71!),{pk(X72!),{pk(X73!),{pk(X74!),{pk(X75!),{pk(X76!),{pk(X77!),{pk(X78!),{pk(X79!),{pk(X80!),{pk(X81!),{pk(X82!),{pk(X83!),{pk(X84!),{pk(X85!),{pk(X86!),{pk(X87!),{pk(X88!),{pk(X89!),{pk(X90!),{pk(X91!),{pk(X92!),{pk(X93!),{pk(X94!),{pk(X95!),{pk(X96!),{pk(X97!),{pk(X98!),{pk(X99!),{pk(X100!),{pk(X101!),{pk(X102!),{pk(X103!),{pk(X104!),{pk(X105!),{pk(X106!),{pk(X107!),{pk(X108!),{pk(X109!),{pk(X110!),{pk(X111!),{pk(X112!),{pk(X113!),{pk(X114!),{pk(X115!),{pk(X116!),{pk(X117!),{pk(X118!),{pk(X119!),{pk(X120!),{pk(X121!),{pk(X122!),{pk(X123!),{pk(X124!),{pk(X125!),{pk(X126!),{pk(X127!),{pk(X128!),pk(X129)}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}})"); | ||
|
|
| @@ -104,8 +104,10 @@ pub fn test_desc_satisfy(cl: &Client, testdata: &TestData, desc: &str) -> Witnes | |||
| let addr = cl | |||
| .get_new_address(None, Some(json::AddressType::Bech32)) | |||
| .unwrap(); | |||
| // Had to decrease 'value', so that fees can be increased | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Whiespace here. Will merge this now, but please take of this in future. Or address in a later PR.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.