Skip to content

add some bold I forgot to add #641

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ We recently held two lang-team design meetings:
consider "things that may not be const-evaluable" as "unsafe" in a
const fn][ralfj].
* [Minutes][m1], [recording][r1]
* Safe transmute project group: We discussed the approaches explored
by the safe transmute group, and in particular did a bit of a deep
dive into the [exciting `typic` crate][typic] being developed by
* **Safe transmute project group**: We discussed the approaches explored
by the safe transmute group, and in particular did a bit of a **deep
dive into the [exciting `typic` crate][typic]** being developed by
[jswrenn]. We looked at what it might make sense to pursue as an
immediate RFC and what ought to stay in the realm of library experimentation
**immediate RFC** and what ought to stay in the realm of library experimentation
for the time being.
* [Minutes][m2], [recording][r2]

Expand Down