-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 647
Log a message if the background worker resets HEAD #3591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe I'm misunderstanding the logic here, but do we even need to call
self.repository.reset()
ifhead == original_head
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I avoided doing an early return here mainly to avoid any unexpected behavior changes to edge cases. It is possible that a previously failed job has staged changes in the index, but failed before the staged changes were committed. In that case, the local and remote
HEAD
commits would match, but the staged changes would become mingled with new changes from the next job.I now actually wonder if a reset is always sufficient. I believe a reset will leave any untracked files alone. So it might be possible that the last job created the local file but failed before the new file was staged. In both cases I think these scenarios are extremely unlikely - we're much more likely to fail when accessing the network than for local file I/O - but maybe we should consider the equivalent of a
git clean -fdx
as well.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we're not sure about these edge cases, would it make sense to unconditionally log the operation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could probably do the equivalent of
git status
and log a message if either the index or working directory isn't clean. Then we could log that as well if there is stale state hanging around. But for this message, I think it makes sense to only log it if the hashes are different.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
okay, sounds good to me