Skip to content

Integrate cargo-deny #6464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2023
Merged

Integrate cargo-deny #6464

merged 2 commits into from
May 10, 2023

Conversation

Turbo87
Copy link
Member

@Turbo87 Turbo87 commented May 10, 2023

@Turbo87 Turbo87 added C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear A-backend ⚙️ labels May 10, 2023
@Turbo87 Turbo87 changed the title WIP: Integrate cargo-deny Integrate cargo-deny May 10, 2023
@Turbo87 Turbo87 marked this pull request as ready for review May 10, 2023 14:10
@Turbo87 Turbo87 requested a review from a team May 10, 2023 14:11
@Turbo87
Copy link
Member Author

Turbo87 commented May 10, 2023

Note that the "Backend / cargo-deny" CI job has been skipped here since the Cargo.lock file was not changed :)

JohnTitor
JohnTitor approved these changes May 10, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@JohnTitor JohnTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit caa9043 into rust-lang:master May 10, 2023
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the cargo-deny branch May 10, 2023 14:33
@Turbo87 Turbo87 mentioned this pull request May 11, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@JohnTitor JohnTitor JohnTitor approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-backend ⚙️ C-internal 🔧 Category: Nonessential work that would make the codebase more consistent or clear
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Turbo87 @JohnTitor