Skip to content

Lock file maintenance (JS) #8629

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024
Merged

Lock file maintenance (JS) #8629

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 13, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@Turbo87 Turbo87 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2024 06:56
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 13, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably 2961681) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/js-lock-file-maintenance branch from fab8a14 to 6de959a Compare May 13, 2024 06:59
@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit 4c4ed16 into main May 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@Turbo87 Turbo87 deleted the renovate/js-lock-file-maintenance branch May 13, 2024 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants