Skip to content

Fix two typos #2755

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2018
Merged

Fix two typos #2755

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion clippy_lints/src/copies.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ fn lint_same_cond(cx: &LateContext, conds: &[&Expr]) {
}
}

/// Implementation if `MATCH_SAME_ARMS`.
/// Implementation of `MATCH_SAME_ARMS`.
fn lint_match_arms(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) {
if let ExprMatch(_, ref arms, MatchSource::Normal) = expr.node {
let hash = |&(_, arm): &(usize, &Arm)| -> u64 {
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion clippy_lints/src/shadow.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
/// **Why is this bad?** Name shadowing can hurt readability, especially in
/// large code bases, because it is easy to lose track of the active binding at
/// any place in the code. This can be alleviated by either giving more specific
/// names to bindings ore introducing more scopes to contain the bindings.
/// names to bindings or introducing more scopes to contain the bindings.
///
/// **Known problems:** This lint, as the other shadowing related lints,
/// currently only catches very simple patterns.
Expand Down