Skip to content

travis: sort integration test jobs so that the jobs taking the most time are run first #4044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2019

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

changelog: none

@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Apr 28, 2019

Yeah, since about two weeks the Travis jobs seem to start with some additional delay each. I'm not really sure why :(

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2019

📌 Commit ee07fa8 has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2019

⌛ Testing commit ee07fa8 with merge 040ef75...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
travis: sort integration test jobs so that the jobs taking the most time are run first

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2019

💥 Test timed out

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2019
travis: sort integration test jobs so that the jobs taking the most time are run first

changelog: none
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2019

⌛ Testing commit ee07fa8 with merge 9e07b35...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 28, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: phansch
Pushing 9e07b35 to master...

@bors bors merged commit ee07fa8 into rust-lang:master Apr 28, 2019
@mati865
Copy link
Member

mati865 commented Apr 28, 2019

@phansch Rust recently migrated to newer machines for Travis, IIRC it happened like 3 weeks ago.
cc @pietroalbini

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

Hmm, we didn't yet migrate to faster Travis machines...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants