Fix syntax highlighting of code fences #5110
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The documentation for RESULT_EXPECT_USED includes this code:
let res: Result<usize, ()> = Ok(1);
res?;
# Ok::<(), ()>(())
Because the code fence didn't start with `rust`, the code wasn't highlighted and the line starting with `#` was displayed on the website. This is now fixed.
|
Thanks! @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit f0dc981 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2020
Fix syntax highlighting of code fence
The documentation for RESULT_EXPECT_USED includes this code:
let res: Result<usize, ()> = Ok(1);
res?;
# Ok::<(), ()>(())
Because the code fence didn't start with `rust`, the code wasn't highlighted and the line starting with `#` was displayed on the website. This is now fixed.
changelog: none
Aloso
changed the title
|
@bors r+ Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit 1f600f3 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 30, 2020
Fix syntax highlighting of code fences
The documentation for RESULT_EXPECT_USED includes this code:
let res: Result<usize, ()> = Ok(1);
res?;
# Ok::<(), ()>(())
Because the code fence didn't start with `rust`, the code wasn't highlighted and the line starting with `#` was displayed on the website. This is now fixed.
EDIT: I noticed that highlighting for some other lints is broken as well. It only works if the code fence looks like this:
````markdown
```rust
// ..
```
````
However, many code blocks were ignored. I un-ignored most code blocks and made them compile by adding hidden code with `#`. While doing so, I found two mistakes:
```rust
opt.map_or(None, |a| a + 1)
// instead of
opt.map_or(None, |a| Some(a + 1))
```
and
```rust
fn as_str(self) -> &str
// instead of
fn as_str(self) -> &'static str
```
changelog: none
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The documentation for RESULT_EXPECT_USED includes this code:
Because the code fence didn't start with
rust, the code wasn't highlighted and the line starting with#was displayed on the website. This is now fixed.EDIT: I noticed that highlighting for some other lints is broken as well. It only works if the code fence looks like this:
However, many code blocks were ignored. I un-ignored most code blocks and made them compile by adding hidden code with
#. While doing so, I found two mistakes:and
changelog: none