Skip to content

Handle another possible error in a unix pipe test #10133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This cropped up on the bsd bot, and if it's an error that gets thrown then it's
fine to just whitelist another type of error in the test.

This cropped up on the bsd bot, and if it's an error that gets thrown then it's
fine to just whitelist another type of error in the test.
alexcrichton referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2013
LLVM is unable to determine this for most cases.

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2034 needs to land upstream before
this is going to have an effect. It's harmless to start generating the
expect hint now.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2013
This cropped up on the bsd bot, and if it's an error that gets thrown then it's
fine to just whitelist another type of error in the test.
@bors bors closed this Oct 29, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants