Rollup of 8 pull requests #142770
Merged
Rollup of 8 pull requests #142770
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This does change the logic a bit: previously, we didn't forward reverse implications of negated features to the backend, instead relying on the backend to handle the implication itself.
Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <[email protected]>
This bumps to the latest versions of `r-efi` and `r-efi-alloc`, which drop the dependency on `compiler_builtins` via crates.io. Part of [rust-lang#142265]. [rust-lang#142265]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142265
rewrite `optimize` attribute to use new attribute parsing infrastructure r? ```@oli-obk``` I'm afraid we'll get quite a few of these PRs in the future. If we get a lot of trivial changes I'll start merging multiple into one PR. They should be easy to review :) Waiting on rust-lang#138165 first
…n, r=nnethercote,WaffleLapkin Extract some shared code from codegen backend target feature handling There's a bunch of code duplication between the GCC and LLVM backends in target feature handling. This moves that into new shared helper functions in `rustc_codegen_ssa`. The first two commits should be purely refactoring. I am fairly sure the LLVM-side behavior stays the same; if the GCC side deliberately diverges from this then I may have missed that. I did account for one divergence, which I do not know is deliberate or not: GCC does not seem to use the `-Ctarget-feature` flag to populate `cfg(target_feature)`. That seems odd, since the `-Ctarget-feature` flag is used to populate the return value of `global_gcc_features` which controls the target features actually used by GCC. ``@GuillaumeGomez`` ``@antoyo`` is there a reason `target_config` ignores `-Ctarget-feature` but `global_gcc_features` does not? The second commit also cleans up a bunch of unneeded complexity added in rust-lang#135927. The third commit extracts some shared logic out of the functions that populate `cfg(target_feature)` and the backend target feature set, respectively. This one actually has some slight functional changes: - Before, with `-Ctarget-feature=-feat`, if there is some other feature `x` that implies `feat` we would *not* add `-x` to the backend target feature set. Now, we do. This fixes rust-lang#134792. - The logic that removes `x` from `cfg(target_feature)` in this case also changed a bit, avoiding a large number of calls to the (uncached) `sess.target.implied_target_features` (if there were a large number of positive features listed before a negative feature) but instead constructing a full inverse implication map when encountering the first negative feature. Ideally this would be done with queries but the backend target feature logic runs before `tcx` so we can't use that... - Previously, if feature "a" implied "b" and "b" was unstable, then using `-Ctarget-feature=+a` would also emit a warning about `b`. I had to remove this since when accounting for negative implications, this emits a ton of warnings in a bunch of existing tests... I assume this was unintentional anyway. The fourth commit increases consistency of the GCC backend with the LLVM backend. The last commit does some further cleanup: - Get rid of RUSTC_SPECIAL_FEATURES. It was only needed for s390x "backchain", but since LLVM 19 that is always a regular target feature so we don't need this hack any more. The hack also has various unintended side-effects so we don't want to keep it. Fixes rust-lang#142412. - Move RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES handling into the shared parse_rust_feature_flag helper so all consumers of `-Ctarget-feature` that only care about actual target features (and not "crt-static") have it. Previously, we actually set `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` twice: once in the backend target feature logic, and once specifically for that one feature. IIUC, some targets are meant to ignore `-Ctarget-feature=+crt-static`, it seems like before this PR that flag still incorrectly enabled `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` (but I didn't test this). - Move fixed_x18 handling together with retpoline handling. - Forbid setting fixed_x18 as a regular target feature, even unstably. It must be set via the `-Z` flag. ``@bjorn3`` I did not touch the cranelift backend here, since AFAIK it doesn't really support target features. But if you ever do, please use the new helpers. :) Cc ``@workingjubilee``
…r=ChrisDenton,tgross35 Implement send_signal for unix child processes Tracking issue: rust-lang#141975 There are two main differences between my implementation and the Public API section of the tracking issue. ~First, `send_signal` requires a mutable reference, like `Child::kill`.~ Second, `ChildExt` has `Sealed` as a supertrait, bringing it more in line with other extension traits like `CommandExt`. try-job: `dist-various*` try-job: `test-various*`
vec_deque/fmt/vec tests: remove static mut More rust-lang#125035. r? ```@tgross35```
Reduce uses of `hir_crate`. I tried rebasing my old incremental-HIR branch. This is a by-product, which is required if we want to get rid of `hir_crate` entirely. The second commit is a drive-by cleanup. It can be pulled into its own PR. r? ````@oli-obk````
Update books ## rust-lang/book 1 commits in 4433c9f0cad8460bee05ede040587f8a1fa3f1de..8a6d44e45b7b564eeb6bae30507e1fbac439d72d 2025-06-18 17:06:36 UTC to 2025-06-18 17:06:36 UTC - Chapter 12 from tech review (rust-lang/book#4410) ## rust-lang/reference 6 commits in d4c66b346f4b72d29e70390a3fa3ea7d4e064db1..50fc1628f36563958399123829c73755fa7a8421 2025-06-19 02:02:39 UTC to 2025-06-17 21:18:46 UTC - Document inferred const args (`feature(generic_arg_infer)`) (rust-lang/reference#1835) - const_eval: we allow references to statics and promoteds (rust-lang/reference#1858) - Fix missing rule on destructors (rust-lang/reference#1861) - Fix inconsistent heading depth (rust-lang/reference#1860) - Fix recursive root-accessible grammar check (rust-lang/reference#1852) - Fix grammar links (rust-lang/reference#1851) ## rust-lang/rust-by-example 1 commits in 9baa9e863116cb9524a177d5a5c475baac18928a..05c7d8bae65f23a1837430c5a19be129d414f5ec 2025-06-18 13:15:17 UTC to 2025-06-18 13:15:17 UTC - Revert "introduce new ````@media```` query to set a higher content width on ultra wide screens" (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1939)
…r, r=Kobzol add comment to `src/bootstrap/build.rs` I attempted to remove this build script but it's apparently needed. Add a comment for why.
…Simulacrum Update library dependencies This bumps to the latest versions of `r-efi` and `r-efi-alloc`, which drop the dependency on `compiler_builtins` via crates.io. Part of [rust-lang#142265]. [rust-lang#142265]: rust-lang#142265
rustbot
added
A-attributes
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:
previous master: 18491d5be0 In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: |
What is this?This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.Comparing 18491d5 (parent) -> 3b97f13 (this PR) Test differencesShow 234 test diffsStage 1
Stage 2
(and 123 additional test diffs) Additionally, 11 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy. Job group index
Test dashboardRun cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard 3b97f1308ff72016a4aaa93fbe6d09d4d6427815 --output-dir test-dashboardAnd then open Job duration changes
How to interpret the job duration changes?Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance |
This was referenced Jun 20, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
optimizeattribute to use new attribute parsing infrastructure #138291 (rewriteoptimizeattribute to use new attribute parsing infrastructure)hir_crate. #142687 (Reduce uses ofhir_crate.)src/bootstrap/build.rs#142714 (add comment tosrc/bootstrap/build.rs)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup