Skip to content

std: Mark two missing functions as #[stable] #20839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Both Extend::extend and DoubleEndedIterator::next_back were intended to be
stable, but they mistakenly didn't have the #[stable] tag.

Both `Extend::extend` and `DoubleEndedIterator::next_back` were intended to be
stable, but they mistakenly didn't have the `#[stable]` tag.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @aturon

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2015
Both `Extend::extend` and `DoubleEndedIterator::next_back` were intended to be
stable, but they mistakenly didn't have the `#[stable]` tag.
@bors bors merged commit ccb1e46 into rust-lang:master Jan 10, 2015
@bluss
Copy link
Member

bluss commented Jan 10, 2015

Vec and String are missing stable on their Extend impls too.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the missing-stability branch January 11, 2015 03:58
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

I think the intention was that the trait's listed stability is inherited by implementations. I think this change was made to rustc, but not to rustdoc. Regardless though, I'll test this once it hits nightlies just to make sure!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants