Skip to content

Reintroduce box syntax where needed #22267

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2015
Merged

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Otherwise, this line is a lie.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

It seems strange to recommend a feature-gated pattern. We should perhaps at least clarify that this is feature-gated?

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Well it wasn't gated originally and it's one of the primary reasons to remove the gate. Is it worth adding that sentence when the gate is gonna end up coming off soon anyway?

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

@steveklabnik It is not clear when the gate will come off.

(For more details, see some notes here: https://github.com/rust-lang/meeting-minutes/blob/master/weekly-meetings/2015-02-10.md#fallout-of-box-rfc )

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Gotcha. I'll add a note about the gate, I guess, then.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

Updated.

Otherwise, this line is a lie.
@Gankra
Copy link
Contributor

Gankra commented Feb 20, 2015

@bors r+ 5ce1b33 rollup

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2015
@huonw huonw merged commit 5ce1b33 into rust-lang:master Feb 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants