Skip to content

docs: correct guessing game to mention old_io module instead of io #22524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2015

Conversation

stevencrockett
Copy link
Contributor

The text is referring to the io module despite the code using the old_io module.

The text is referring to the io module despite the code using the old_io module.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@stevencrockett
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ e0067f9 rollup

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Yes, I have a ticket open to deal with rand already, and this is a good fix in the meantime.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2015
 The text is referring to the io module despite the code using the old_io module.
Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2015
 The text is referring to the io module despite the code using the old_io module.
@huonw huonw merged commit e0067f9 into rust-lang:master Feb 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants