Skip to content

rustc: Remove some long deprecated features: #23506

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

  • no_split_stack was renamed to no_stack_check
  • deriving was renamed to derive
  • use foo::mod was renamed to use foo::self;
  • legacy lifetime definitions in closures have been replaced with for syntax
  • fn foo() -> &A + B has been deprecated for some time (needs parens)
  • Obsolete for Sized? syntax
  • Obsolete Sized? Foo syntax
  • Obsolete |T| -> U syntax

* no_split_stack was renamed to no_stack_check
* deriving was renamed to derive
* `use foo::mod` was renamed to `use foo::self`;
* legacy lifetime definitions in closures have been replaced with `for` syntax
* `fn foo() -> &A + B` has been deprecated for some time (needs parens)
* Obsolete `for Sized?` syntax
* Obsolete `Sized? Foo` syntax
* Obsolete `|T| -> U` syntax
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Mar 20, 2015

LGTM

@alexcrichton alexcrichton assigned aturon and unassigned brson Mar 23, 2015
@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Mar 23, 2015

@bors: r+ f945190

alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2015
…things

Conflicts:
	src/test/run-pass/deprecated-no-split-stack.rs
@bors bors merged commit f945190 into rust-lang:master Mar 24, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the remove-some-deprecated-things branch April 2, 2015 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants