delete some old tests

[steveklabnik]

These are for syntaxes that haven't existed for a long time.

[rust-highfive]

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[tshepang]

Aren't these tests still valid? Is it enough to just trust that the compiler rejects such syntax?

[nikomatsakis]

they are indeed still valid tests, but then a regression here seems rather unlikely

[brson]

@bors r+ Yeah, I think it's safe to assume anything here is also covered elsewhere.

[bors]

📌 Commit b5a7827 has been approved by brson

[brson]

Oh, I didn't look closely before commenting. Still, I feel ok about removing them. Nobody's going to accidentally reimplement old syntaxes.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit b5a7827 with merge 4f33e43...

[tshepang]

Looks like there are other tests for old syntax. What should be done with them? I imagine these were only really useful pre-1.0?

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - auto-linux-32-nopt-t, auto-linux-32-opt, auto-linux-64-nopt-t, auto-linux-64-opt, auto-linux-64-x-android-t, auto-mac-32-opt, auto-mac-64-nopt-t, auto-mac-64-opt, auto-win-gnu-32-nopt-t, auto-win-gnu-32-opt, auto-win-gnu-64-nopt-t, auto-win-gnu-64-opt, auto-win-msvc-32-opt, auto-win-msvc-64-opt