Skip to content

trans: Specify archive_format for MSVC #27518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2015

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This means that we no longer need to ship the llvm-ar.exe binary in the MSVC
distribution, and after a snapshot we can remove a good bit of logic from the
makefiles!

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @huonw

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@huonw
Copy link
Member

huonw commented Aug 4, 2015

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 4, 2015

📌 Commit 2800141 has been approved by huonw

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 2800141 with merge 701f4a5...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-msvc-64-opt

@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the msvc-builtin-llvm-ar branch 2 times, most recently from 70e6053 to 381f41a Compare August 5, 2015 16:53
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=huonw 381f41a

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 381f41a with merge 8f0aa2f...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 5, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-msvc-64-opt

@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the msvc-builtin-llvm-ar branch from 381f41a to 29dec2f Compare August 6, 2015 00:17
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=huonw

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:48 AM, bors [email protected] wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-win-msvc-64-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-win-msvc-64-opt/builds/956


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27518 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 6, 2015

📌 Commit 29dec2f has been approved by huonw

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 6, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 29dec2f with merge 8dd1721...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 6, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-win-msvc-64-opt

@alexcrichton alexcrichton force-pushed the msvc-builtin-llvm-ar branch 7 times, most recently from 3cba7fc to d0537f0 Compare August 11, 2015 00:41
This means that we no longer need to ship the `llvm-ar.exe` binary in the MSVC
distribution, and after a snapshot we can remove a good bit of logic from the
makefiles!
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=huonw 138252c

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2015
This means that we no longer need to ship the `llvm-ar.exe` binary in the MSVC
distribution, and after a snapshot we can remove a good bit of logic from the
makefiles!
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 11, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 138252c with merge b36599c...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 11, 2015

💔 Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:11 PM, bors [email protected] wrote:

[image: 💔] Test failed - auto-linux-64-opt
http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux-64-opt/builds/6026


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#27518 (comment).

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 11, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 138252c with merge 23f4389...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2015
This means that we no longer need to ship the `llvm-ar.exe` binary in the MSVC
distribution, and after a snapshot we can remove a good bit of logic from the
makefiles!
@bors bors merged commit 138252c into rust-lang:master Aug 11, 2015
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the msvc-builtin-llvm-ar branch August 14, 2015 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants