Skip to content

Book: Update raw/byte string literal in syntax index #29438

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2015

Conversation

jethrogb
Copy link
Contributor

The raw byte string literal syntax in the syntax index was incorrect. Also added links to the reference for raw and/or byte string literals.

The raw byte string literal syntax in the syntax index was incorrect. Also added links to the reference for raw and/or byte string literals.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 14eef41

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: rollup

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
…xcrichton

The raw byte string literal syntax in the syntax index was incorrect. Also added links to the reference for raw and/or byte string literals.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
@bors bors merged commit 14eef41 into rust-lang:master Oct 29, 2015
@jethrogb jethrogb deleted the topic/book-rbstrlit branch December 14, 2015 04:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants