Skip to content

[LLVM 4.0] Update rustllvm to understand the new DIBulder::createBasicType API #38294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

dylanmckay
Copy link
Contributor

This lets Rust work with the createBasicType API in LLVM 4.0.

The alignment argument was dropped in D25073.

This lets Rust work with the createBasicType API in LLVM 4.0.

The alignment argument was dropped in D25073.

- https://reviews.llvm.org/D25073
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @alexcrichton

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@dylanmckay dylanmckay mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2016
23 tasks
@dylanmckay
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will bring us closer to upgrading to LLVM 4.0 in #37609

@dylanmckay dylanmckay changed the title Update rustllvm to understand the new DIBulder::createBasicType API [LLVM 4.0] Update rustllvm to understand the new DIBulder::createBasicType API Dec 11, 2016
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2016

📌 Commit f65552f has been approved by alexcrichton

@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

shepmaster commented Dec 12, 2016

FWIW, I was trying to move the alignment argument: avr-rust@350ff59

Also, trailing commas aren't supported in C function calls, IIRC. That's not this problem.

@dylanmckay
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shepmaster I didn't notice that commit earlier! That's a much better solution. I'll close this PR.

@dylanmckay dylanmckay closed this Dec 12, 2016
@shepmaster
Copy link
Member

Opened #38317 with that commit.

@dylanmckay dylanmckay deleted the llvm-4.0-createbasictype branch February 4, 2017 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants