Fix is_absolute on Redox #38935
Merged
Fix is_absolute on Redox #38935
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
r? @sfackler (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
r? @brson |
|
@brson, have you seen this? |
jackpot51
force-pushed
the
fix_path_redox
branch
from
82a3f9f to
ca2ade1
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit ca2ade1 has been approved by |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2017
Fix is_absolute on Redox Due to not using prefixes on Redox, yet, it must be added as an exception to Path::is_absolute.
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to not using prefixes on Redox, yet, it must be added as an exception to Path::is_absolute.