Skip to content

Fix overflowing_literals lint for large f32s #43325

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2017

Conversation

ollie27
Copy link
Member

@ollie27 ollie27 commented Jul 19, 2017

Float literals need to be parsed as the correct type so they can be
rounded correctly.

Float literals need to be parsed as the correct type so they can be
rounded correctly.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @pnkfelix

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@aidanhs aidanhs added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 20, 2017
@carols10cents
Copy link
Member

friendly ping to keep this on your radar @pnkfelix ! also pinging you on irc!

@arielb1
Copy link
Contributor

arielb1 commented Jul 24, 2017

Nice catch!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 24, 2017

📌 Commit 697491c has been approved by arielb1

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 25, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 697491c with merge 917260e...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2017
Fix overflowing_literals lint for large f32s

Float literals need to be parsed as the correct type so they can be
rounded correctly.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 25, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: arielb1
Pushing 917260e to master...

@bors bors merged commit 697491c into rust-lang:master Jul 25, 2017
@ollie27 ollie27 deleted the overflowing_literals branch July 25, 2017 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants