Skip to content

Prevent Error::type_id overrides #60902

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 17, 2019
Merged

Prevent Error::type_id overrides #60902

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
e836a4c
Prevent Error::type_id overrides
sfackler May 17, 2019
686a611
Update src/libstd/error.rs
sfackler May 17, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions src/libstd/error.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -201,11 +201,19 @@ pub trait Error: Debug + Display {
#[unstable(feature = "error_type_id",
reason = "this is memory unsafe to override in user code",
issue = "60784")]
fn type_id(&self) -> TypeId where Self: 'static {
fn type_id(&self, _: private::Internal) -> TypeId where Self: 'static {
TypeId::of::<Self>()
}
}

mod private {
// this is a hack to prevent type_id from being overridden by Error
// implementations, since that can enable unsound downcasting.
#[unstable(feature = "error_type_id", issue = "60784")]
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct Internal;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would pub(crate) be a better option?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, that violates the private types in public interfaces check.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hypothetically, what would happen if somebody fixed this technical loophole? Would the fix then be blocked on the grounds of this workaround-hack?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @petrochenkov

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed which loophole? Allowing such a pseudo public type in an exported interface? Fixing that would likely require a new edition, as many libraries already take advantage.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not a loophole - it was the explicit design of the relevant RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/26197104b7bb9a5a35db243d639aee6e46d35d75/text/0136-no-privates-in-public.md#when-is-an-item-public

}

#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
impl<'a, E: Error + 'a> From<E> for Box<dyn Error + 'a> {
/// Converts a type of [`Error`] into a box of dyn [`Error`].
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -575,7 +583,7 @@ impl dyn Error + 'static {
let t = TypeId::of::<T>();

// Get TypeId of the type in the trait object
let boxed = self.type_id();
let boxed = self.type_id(private::Internal);

// Compare both TypeIds on equality
t == boxed
Expand Down