Miscellaneous inlining improvements

[tmiasko]

Inline a few small and hot functions.

[rust-highfive]

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[tmiasko]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 481e1fd with merge 6dc1ac2467889dc8582289112bf067b3dc68de9e...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 6dc1ac2467889dc8582289112bf067b3dc68de9e (6dc1ac2467889dc8582289112bf067b3dc68de9e)

[rust-timer]

Queued 6dc1ac2467889dc8582289112bf067b3dc68de9e with parent cecdb18, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking try commit (6dc1ac2467889dc8582289112bf067b3dc68de9e): comparison url.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. Please note that if the perf results are neutral, you should likely undo the rollup=never given below by specifying rollup- to bors.

Importantly, though, if the results of this run are non-neutral do not roll this PR up -- it will mask other regressions or improvements in the roll up.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf

[petrochenkov]

Nice.
@bors r+

@tmiasko
How did you find these?
I thought everything that is small and showed as hot by perf was already inlined long ago.

[bors]

📌 Commit 481e1fd has been approved by petrochenkov

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 481e1fd with merge 3da2dd3...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: petrochenkov
Pushing 3da2dd3 to master...

[tmiasko]

@petrochenkov I was looking at some perf reports and noticed those. Exposed by code refactoring most likely, given that each individually doesn't amount to much, easy to miss when no one is looking.