Try to evaluate in try unify and postpone resolution of constants that contain inference variables

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/mod.rs

@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
 use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::{Canonical, CanonicalVarValues};
 use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::{ConstVarValue, ConstVariableValue};
 use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::{ConstVariableOrigin, ConstVariableOriginKind, ToType};
-use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
-use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::EvalToConstValueResult;
+use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::{ErrorHandled, EvalToConstValueResult};
 use rustc_middle::traits::select;
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::fold::{TypeFoldable, TypeFolder};
@@ -687,15 +686,23 @@ pub struct CombinedSnapshot<'a, 'tcx> {
 impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
     /// calls `tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts` after
     /// canonicalizing the consts.
+    #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
     pub fn try_unify_abstract_consts(
         &self,
         a: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
         b: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
+        param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     ) -> bool {
+        // Reject any attempt to unify two unevaluated constants that contain inference
+        // variables, since inference variables in queries lead to ICEs.
+        if a.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() || b.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
+            debug!("a or b contain infer vars in its substs -> cannot unify");
+            return false;
+        }
+
         let canonical = self.canonicalize_query((a, b), &mut OriginalQueryValues::default());
-        debug!("canonical consts: {:?}", &canonical.value);
 
-        self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(canonical.value)
+        self.tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(param_env.and(canonical.value))
     }
 
     pub fn is_in_snapshot(&self) -> bool {
@@ -1598,22 +1605,29 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
     ///
     /// This handles inferences variables within both `param_env` and `substs` by
     /// performing the operation on their respective canonical forms.
+    #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
     pub fn const_eval_resolve(
         &self,
         param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
         unevaluated: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx>,
         span: Option<Span>,
     ) -> EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> {
         let substs = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(unevaluated.substs);
+        debug!(?substs);
 
         // Postpone the evaluation of constants whose substs depend on inference
         // variables
         if substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
-            return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
+            debug!("substs have infer types or consts: {:?}", substs);
+            if substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
+                return Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric);
+            }
         }
 
         let param_env_erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(param_env);
         let substs_erased = self.tcx.erase_regions(substs);
+        debug!(?param_env_erased);
+        debug!(?substs_erased);
 
         let unevaluated = ty::Unevaluated {
             def: unevaluated.def,

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/queries.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 use super::{ErrorHandled, EvalToConstValueResult, GlobalId};
 
 use crate::mir;
+use crate::ty::fold::TypeFoldable;
 use crate::ty::subst::InternalSubsts;
 use crate::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
 use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
@@ -38,6 +39,13 @@ impl<'tcx> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
         ct: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx>,
         span: Option<Span>,
     ) -> EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> {
+        // Cannot resolve `Unevaluated` constants that contain inference
+        // variables. We reject those here since `resolve_opt_const_arg`
+        // would fail otherwise
+        if ct.substs.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
+            bug!("did not expect inference variables here");
+        }
+
         match ty::Instance::resolve_opt_const_arg(self, param_env, ct.def, ct.substs) {
             Ok(Some(instance)) => {
                 let cid = GlobalId { instance, promoted: ct.promoted };

compiler/rustc_middle/src/query/mod.rs

@@ -329,12 +329,12 @@ rustc_queries! {
         }
     }
 
-    query try_unify_abstract_consts(key: (
-        ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>, ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>
-    )) -> bool {
+    query try_unify_abstract_consts(key:
+        ty::ParamEnvAnd<'tcx, (ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>, ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>
+    )>) -> bool {
         desc {
             |tcx| "trying to unify the generic constants {} and {}",
-            tcx.def_path_str(key.0.def.did), tcx.def_path_str(key.1.def.did)
+            tcx.def_path_str(key.value.0.def.did), tcx.def_path_str(key.value.1.def.did)
         }
     }
 

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/relate.rs

@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ pub fn super_relate_consts<'tcx, R: TypeRelation<'tcx>>(
         (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(au), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(bu))
             if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs =>
         {
-            tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts((au.shrink(), bu.shrink()))
+            tcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(relation.param_env().and((au.shrink(), bu.shrink())))
         }
 
         // While this is slightly incorrect, it shouldn't matter for `min_const_generics`

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs

@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ use std::iter;
 use std::ops::ControlFlow;
 
 /// Check if a given constant can be evaluated.
+#[instrument(skip(infcx), level = "debug")]
 pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
     infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
     uv: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
     param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
     span: Span,
 ) -> Result<(), NotConstEvaluatable> {
-    debug!("is_const_evaluatable({:?})", uv);
     let tcx = infcx.tcx;
 
     if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
     }
 }
 
+#[instrument(skip(tcx), level = "debug")]
 fn satisfied_from_param_env<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
@@ -197,11 +198,12 @@ fn satisfied_from_param_env<'tcx>(
                     // Try to unify with each subtree in the AbstractConst to allow for
                     // `N + 1` being const evaluatable even if theres only a `ConstEvaluatable`
                     // predicate for `(N + 1) * 2`
-                    let result =
-                        walk_abstract_const(tcx, b_ct, |b_ct| match try_unify(tcx, ct, b_ct) {
+                    let result = walk_abstract_const(tcx, b_ct, |b_ct| {
+                        match try_unify(tcx, ct, b_ct, param_env) {
                             true => ControlFlow::BREAK,
                             false => ControlFlow::CONTINUE,
-                        });
+                        }
+                    });
 
                     if let ControlFlow::Break(()) = result {
                         debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
@@ -567,14 +569,27 @@ pub(super) fn thir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
     }
 }
 
+/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
+#[instrument(skip(tcx), level = "debug")]
+pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
+    tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+    a: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
+    b: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
+    param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
+) -> bool {
+    let const_unify_ctxt = ConstUnifyCtxt::new(tcx, param_env);
+    const_unify_ctxt.try_unify_inner(a, b)
+}
+
 pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
     (a, b): (ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>, ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>),
+    param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
 ) -> bool {
     (|| {
         if let Some(a) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, a)? {
             if let Some(b) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, b)? {
-                return Ok(try_unify(tcx, a, b));
+                return Ok(try_unify(tcx, a, b, param_env));
             }
         }
 
@@ -619,88 +634,119 @@ where
     recurse(tcx, ct, &mut f)
 }
 
-/// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
-pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
+pub(super) struct ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
     tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
-    mut a: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
-    mut b: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
-) -> bool {
-    // We substitute generics repeatedly to allow AbstractConsts to unify where a
+    param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
+}
+
+impl<'tcx> ConstUnifyCtxt<'tcx> {
+    pub(super) fn new(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>) -> Self {
+        ConstUnifyCtxt { tcx, param_env }
+    }
+
+    // Substitutes generics repeatedly to allow AbstractConsts to unify where a
     // ConstKind::Unevalated could be turned into an AbstractConst that would unify e.g.
     // Param(N) should unify with Param(T), substs: [Unevaluated("T2", [Unevaluated("T3", [Param(N)])])]
-    while let Node::Leaf(a_ct) = a.root(tcx) {
-        match AbstractConst::from_const(tcx, a_ct) {
-            Ok(Some(a_act)) => a = a_act,
-            Ok(None) => break,
-            Err(_) => return true,
-        }
-    }
-    while let Node::Leaf(b_ct) = b.root(tcx) {
-        match AbstractConst::from_const(tcx, b_ct) {
-            Ok(Some(b_act)) => b = b_act,
-            Ok(None) => break,
-            Err(_) => return true,
+    #[inline]
+    #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
+    pub(super) fn try_replace_substs_in_root(
+        &self,
+        mut abstr_const: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
+    ) -> Option<AbstractConst<'tcx>> {
+        while let Node::Leaf(ct) = abstr_const.root(self.tcx) {
+            match AbstractConst::from_const(self.tcx, ct) {
+                Ok(Some(act)) => abstr_const = act,
+                Ok(None) => break,
+                Err(_) => return None,
+            }
         }
-    }
 
-    match (a.root(tcx), b.root(tcx)) {
-        (Node::Leaf(a_ct), Node::Leaf(b_ct)) => {
-            if a_ct.ty() != b_ct.ty() {
-                return false;
-            }
+        Some(abstr_const)
+    }
 
-            match (a_ct.val(), b_ct.val()) {
-                // We can just unify errors with everything to reduce the amount of
-                // emitted errors here.
-                (ty::ConstKind::Error(_), _) | (_, ty::ConstKind::Error(_)) => true,
-                (ty::ConstKind::Param(a_param), ty::ConstKind::Param(b_param)) => {
-                    a_param == b_param
+    /// Tries to unify two abstract constants using structural equality.
+    #[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
+    fn try_unify_inner(&self, a: AbstractConst<'tcx>, b: AbstractConst<'tcx>) -> bool {
+        let a = if let Some(a) = self.try_replace_substs_in_root(a) {
+            a
+        } else {
+            return true;
+        };
+
+        let b = if let Some(b) = self.try_replace_substs_in_root(b) {
+            b
+        } else {
+            return true;
+        };
+
+        let a_root = a.root(self.tcx);
+        let b_root = b.root(self.tcx);
+        debug!(?a_root, ?b_root);
+
+        match (a_root, b_root) {
+            (Node::Leaf(a_ct), Node::Leaf(b_ct)) => {
+                let a_ct = a_ct.eval(self.tcx, self.param_env);
+                debug!("a_ct evaluated: {:?}", a_ct);
+                let b_ct = b_ct.eval(self.tcx, self.param_env);
+                debug!("b_ct evaluated: {:?}", b_ct);
+
+                if a_ct.ty() != b_ct.ty() {
+                    return false;
                 }
-                (ty::ConstKind::Value(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Value(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
-                // If we have `fn a<const N: usize>() -> [u8; N + 1]` and `fn b<const M: usize>() -> [u8; 1 + M]`
-                // we do not want to use `assert_eq!(a(), b())` to infer that `N` and `M` have to be `1`. This
-                // means that we only allow inference variables if they are equal.
-                (ty::ConstKind::Infer(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Infer(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
-                // We expand generic anonymous constants at the start of this function, so this
-                // branch should only be taking when dealing with associated constants, at
-                // which point directly comparing them seems like the desired behavior.
-                //
-                // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): This isn't actually the case.
-                // We also take this branch for concrete anonymous constants and
-                // expand generic anonymous constants with concrete substs.
-                (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(a_uv), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(b_uv)) => {
-                    a_uv == b_uv
+
+                match (a_ct.val(), b_ct.val()) {
+                    // We can just unify errors with everything to reduce the amount of
+                    // emitted errors here.
+                    (ty::ConstKind::Error(_), _) | (_, ty::ConstKind::Error(_)) => true,
+                    (ty::ConstKind::Param(a_param), ty::ConstKind::Param(b_param)) => {
+                        a_param == b_param
+                    }
+                    (ty::ConstKind::Value(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Value(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
+                    // If we have `fn a<const N: usize>() -> [u8; N + 1]` and `fn b<const M: usize>() -> [u8; 1 + M]`
+                    // we do not want to use `assert_eq!(a(), b())` to infer that `N` and `M` have to be `1`. This
+                    // means that we only allow inference variables if they are equal.
+                    (ty::ConstKind::Infer(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Infer(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
+                    // We expand generic anonymous constants at the start of this function, so this
+                    // branch should only be taking when dealing with associated constants, at
+                    // which point directly comparing them seems like the desired behavior.
+                    //
+                    // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): This isn't actually the case.
+                    // We also take this branch for concrete anonymous constants and
+                    // expand generic anonymous constants with concrete substs.
+                    (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(a_uv), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(b_uv)) => {
+                        a_uv == b_uv
+                    }
+                    // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We may want to either actually try
+                    // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
+                    // this, for now we just return false here.
+                    _ => false,
                 }
-                // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): We may want to either actually try
-                // to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
-                // this, for now we just return false here.
-                _ => false,
             }
+            (Node::Binop(a_op, al, ar), Node::Binop(b_op, bl, br)) if a_op == b_op => {
+                self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
+                    && self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
+            }
+            (Node::UnaryOp(a_op, av), Node::UnaryOp(b_op, bv)) if a_op == b_op => {
+                self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
+            }
+            (Node::FunctionCall(a_f, a_args), Node::FunctionCall(b_f, b_args))
+                if a_args.len() == b_args.len() =>
+            {
+                self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
+                    && iter::zip(a_args, b_args)
+                        .all(|(&an, &bn)| self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
+            }
+            (Node::Cast(a_kind, a_operand, a_ty), Node::Cast(b_kind, b_operand, b_ty))
+                if (a_ty == b_ty) && (a_kind == b_kind) =>
+            {
+                self.try_unify_inner(a.subtree(a_operand), b.subtree(b_operand))
+            }
+            // use this over `_ => false` to make adding variants to `Node` less error prone
+            (Node::Cast(..), _)
+            | (Node::FunctionCall(..), _)
+            | (Node::UnaryOp(..), _)
+            | (Node::Binop(..), _)
+            | (Node::Leaf(..), _) => false,
         }
-        (Node::Binop(a_op, al, ar), Node::Binop(b_op, bl, br)) if a_op == b_op => {
-            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
-                && try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
-        }
-        (Node::UnaryOp(a_op, av), Node::UnaryOp(b_op, bv)) if a_op == b_op => {
-            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
-        }
-        (Node::FunctionCall(a_f, a_args), Node::FunctionCall(b_f, b_args))
-            if a_args.len() == b_args.len() =>
-        {
-            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
-                && iter::zip(a_args, b_args)
-                    .all(|(&an, &bn)| try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
-        }
-        (Node::Cast(a_kind, a_operand, a_ty), Node::Cast(b_kind, b_operand, b_ty))
-            if (a_ty == b_ty) && (a_kind == b_kind) =>
-        {
-            try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(a_operand), b.subtree(b_operand))
-        }
-        // use this over `_ => false` to make adding variants to `Node` less error prone
-        (Node::Cast(..), _)
-        | (Node::FunctionCall(..), _)
-        | (Node::UnaryOp(..), _)
-        | (Node::Binop(..), _)
-        | (Node::Leaf(..), _) => false,
     }
 }

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/fulfill.rs

@@ -581,7 +581,11 @@ impl<'a, 'b, 'tcx> FulfillProcessor<'a, 'b, 'tcx> {
                         if let (ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(a), ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(b)) =
                             (c1.val(), c2.val())
                         {
-                            if infcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(a.shrink(), b.shrink()) {
+                            if infcx.try_unify_abstract_consts(
+                                a.shrink(),
+                                b.shrink(),
+                                obligation.param_env,
+                            ) {
                                 return ProcessResult::Changed(vec![]);
                             }
                         }