Skip to content

rustc-perf section for 2023-08-14 #4622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2023
Merged

rustc-perf section for 2023-08-14 #4622

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion draft/2023-08-16-this-week-in-rust.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -71,7 +71,16 @@ If you are a Rust project owner and are looking for contributors, please submit

### Rust Compiler Performance Triage

<!-- Perf results go here -->
A light week. Main thing to report is we got some improvements from telling LLVM
that the negation in `<*const T>::sub` cannot overflow.

Triage done by **@pnkfelix**.
Revision range: [443c3161..e8459109](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=443c3161dd04f4c1b656a626f9079921bee9c326&end=e8459109bbb440764c1c877032189a27b9e76c4e&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au)

0 Regressions, 1 Improvements, 4 Mixed; 1 of them in rollups
49 artifact comparisons made in total

[Full report here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/blob/master/triage/2023-08-14.md)

### [Approved RFCs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/commits/master)

Expand Down