Skip to content

JP - Initial SBT structure #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2016
Merged

Conversation

juanpedromoreno
Copy link
Contributor

Please, @dialelo @raulraja review at your convenience.

Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 6, 2016

A new repo is born 👶

LGTM!

@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno merged commit a6b129c into master Jul 6, 2016
@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno deleted the jp-initial-sbt-structure branch July 6, 2016 10:13
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
addSbtPlugin("org.scala-exercises" % "sbt-exercise" % "0.1.1", "0.13", "2.10")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will also need to point to 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in this other PR
#2

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 12:19 PM Raúl Raja Martínez [email protected]
wrote:

In project/plugins.sbt
#1 (comment)
:

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+addSbtPlugin("org.scala-exercises" % "sbt-exercise" % "0.1.1", "0.13", "2.10")

This will also need to point to 0.2.1-SNAPSHOT


You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/scala-exercises/exercises-fpinscala/pull/1/files/5c429fe1363c9e1cf6d454fd64ac7de40a683883#r69706694,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEp0DQKNcCiBGHt9cqeqimbgGXdo9qNBks5qS4EigaJpZM4JF7sl
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants