Blog post on implicit functions #570
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ashawley
reviewed
Dec 7, 2016
|
|
||
| ## Conclusion | ||
|
|
||
| Implicit function types are unique way to abstract over the context in |
ashawley
reviewed
Dec 7, 2016
| succeed by defining the required implicit parameters. | ||
|
|
||
| There is one final tweak to make this all work: When using implicit parameters | ||
| for nested functions it was so far important to give all implicit parameters |
ashawley
reviewed
Dec 7, 2016
|
|
||
| (implicit thisTransaction: Transaction) | ||
|
|
||
| A three-times repetition might not look so bad here, but it certainly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"[Having to repeat] three-times might"
sjrd
reviewed
Dec 7, 2016
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| I just made the [first pull request](https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/pull/1775) to add _implicit function types_ to | ||
| Scala. I am pretty excited about it, because - citing the explanation |
|
I think the pull request pointing to the dotty repo should be clear enough.
…On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Sébastien Doeraene ***@***.*** > wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In blog/_posts/2016-12-05-implicit-function-types.md
<#570 (review)>:
> @@ -0,0 +1,364 @@
+---
+layout: blog
+title: Implicit Function Types
+author: Martin Odersky
+authorImg: /images/martin.jpg
+---
+
+I just made the [first pull request](scala/scala3#1775) to add _implicit function types_ to
+Scala. I am pretty excited about it, because - citing the explanation
Scala -> Dotty?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#570 (review)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAwlVhXylle-ttpts81mmydtA1eI3YMCks5rFsdngaJpZM4LGnEW>
.
--
Martin Odersky
EPFL and Lightbend
|
|
It's merged but not showing up. What's wrong? |
|
fixed in b287dc0 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'd like to release this today, so that people can read it before the ScalaX talk. So it would be good to merge this quickly.