Skip to content

Fix #2140: Avoid exponential subtype complexity #2890

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2017
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 3 additions & 7 deletions compiler/src/dotty/tools/dotc/core/TypeComparer.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -983,17 +983,13 @@ class TypeComparer(initctx: Context) extends DotClass with ConstraintHandling {

/** A type has been covered previously in subtype checking if it
* is some combination of TypeRefs that point to classes, where the
* combiners are RefinedTypes, RecTypes, AndTypes or AnnotatedTypes.
* One exception: Refinements referring to basetype args are never considered
* to be already covered. This is necessary because such refined types might
* still need to be compared with a compareAliasRefined.
* combiners are RefinedTypes, RecTypes, And/Or-Types or AnnotatedTypes.
*/
private def isCovered(tp: Type): Boolean = tp.dealias.stripTypeVar match {
private def isCovered(tp: Type): Boolean = tp.dealias.stripTypeVar match {
case tp: TypeRef => tp.symbol.isClass && tp.symbol != NothingClass && tp.symbol != NullClass
case tp: ProtoType => false
case tp: RefinedOrRecType => isCovered(tp.parent)
case tp: AnnotatedType => isCovered(tp.underlying)
case AndType(tp1, tp2) => isCovered(tp1) && isCovered(tp2)
case tp: AndOrType => isCovered(tp.tp1) && isCovered(tp.tp2)
case _ => false
}

Expand Down
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions tests/pending/pos/i2140.scala
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
object Test {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
val s = 1
val t = 23 match {
case 0 => (s)
case 1 => (s, s)
case 2 => (s, s, s)
case 3 => (s, s, s, s)
case 4 => (s, s, s, s, s)
case 5 => (s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 6 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 7 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 8 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 9 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 10 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 11 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 12 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 13 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 14 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 15 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 16 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 17 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 18 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 19 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 20 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
case 21 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
// case 22 => (s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s, s)
}
}
}