Skip to content

Fix docs for declaring implicit defs types #4923

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 10, 2018

Conversation

dwijnand
Copy link
Member

I think this is what's meant. Unless I'm very confused.

Copy link
Member

@dottybot dottybot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, and thank you for opening this PR! 🎉

All contributors have signed the CLA, thank you! ❤️

Have an awesome day! ☀️

Copy link
Contributor

@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. But I noticed that change 2 has been reverted in #4738 and we allow singleton types again: wanna fix that too?

@Blaisorblade Blaisorblade merged commit 72fd1cb into scala:master Aug 10, 2018
@dwijnand dwijnand deleted the patch-1 branch August 10, 2018 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants