Skip to content

feat(eslint-config-react): enable for..of syntax and react/no-unstable-nested-components #320

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2021

Conversation

chambo-e
Copy link
Contributor

@chambo-e chambo-e commented Aug 9, 2021

Also documented the rules override we have

BREAKING CHANGE: react/no-unstable-nested-components is enforced

@chambo-e chambo-e requested a review from a team August 9, 2021 19:40
@chambo-e chambo-e self-assigned this Aug 9, 2021
@chambo-e chambo-e requested review from adriengibrat and vincentaudebert and removed request for a team August 9, 2021 19:41
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 9, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #320 (fec2c29) into master (44de51a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #320   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           11        11           
  Lines          345       345           
  Branches        55        55           
=========================================
  Hits           345       345           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 44de51a...fec2c29. Read the comment docs.

@chambo-e chambo-e merged commit 9c03f8c into master Aug 10, 2021
@chambo-e chambo-e deleted the feat/enable_for_in branch August 10, 2021 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants