Skip to content

Add 'in' operator to FQL documentation #2849

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2022
Merged

Add 'in' operator to FQL documentation #2849

merged 4 commits into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

tysonmote
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

This PR adds the new 'in' operator to the FQL documentation.

Merge timing

As soon as it is approved.

@tysonmote tysonmote requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2022 04:44
@tysonmote tysonmote requested review from rchinn1 and jayakrishnannair and removed request for a team May 6, 2022 04:44
@@ -100,6 +105,7 @@ If your field name has a character not in the set of `{a-z A-Z 0-9 _ -}`, you mu
| `>=` | `number` | `number` | `true` if the left side is greater than or equal to the right side. |
| `<` | `number` | `number` | `true` if the left side is less than the right side. |
| `<=` | `number` | `number` | `true` if the left side is less than or equal to the right side. |
| `in` | `string`, `number`, `bool`, or `null` | `list` | `true` if the left side is contained in the list of values. |

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Wondering if we should mention that using in is much more efficient than chaining or conditions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think so, personally. Customers shouldn't have to worry about our internal implementation's efficiency, and it wouldn't make a difference to them anyways.

@rchinn1 rchinn1 merged commit 114822c into develop May 6, 2022
@rchinn1 rchinn1 deleted the update-fql branch May 6, 2022 14:33
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2022

Thank you for your contribution! Your pull request is merged, but may take a day or two to appear on the site.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants