Skip to content

DeepDiff 6.2.0 - Using difflib to come up with better diff results when order is #347

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 4, 2022

Conversation

seperman
Copy link
Owner

@seperman seperman commented Sep 4, 2022

DeepDiff 6.2.0 - Using difflib to come up with better diff results when order is.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 4, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #347 (6146e3d) into master (e916b5f) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #347   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.41%   99.42%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        3098     3144   +46     
=======================================
+ Hits         3080     3126   +46     
  Misses         18       18           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
deepdiff/diff.py 99.75% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
deepdiff/helper.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
deepdiff/model.py 99.75% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@seperman seperman merged commit 98c5815 into master Sep 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants